First, open your Parallels application, then select File and click New. To install Windows on your Mac, you need to create a virtual machine for the Windows operating system. Step 3: Create a New Virtual Machine.This is substantially slower - especially on Parallels - often locking up for 5-10 seconds.Buy a PC or a gaming console at this point for gaming. Then only performance problem I have had - which is ongoing - is when I switch to retina mode in the VM (on my 12'). Testing Hardware & SoftwareI have run both VMWare & Parallels on 11' MacBook Airs - and on my current 12' MacBook. As a follow-up to our virtualization benchmark showdown last fall, we began testing the new version immediately and we have some preliminary benchmarks to share. Version 9 brings many new features to the virtualization game, but Parallels also promises significant performance improvements. Parallels Desktop for Mac in 2021 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below.Parallels released Parallels Desktop 9 , the latest version of the company’s virtualization software, early Thursday.Note that most tests cite only Windows 7 results for the sake of simplicity in reading the charts. Run Windows 8, 7 and XP apps like they were made for a Mac while enjoying Mac gestures and features like Dictation in Windows appsFor tests that cite “native” performance, we used Windows 7 Enterprise x64 installed via Boot Camp on the MacBook Pro. Box includes one Product Key Card - No Disc. All operating systems were updated with the latest publicly available patches and updates.Parallels Desktop 9 for Mac is the worlds most powerful solution for running Windows and Mac OS X applications on a Mac, side-by-side- without rebooting. Our host operating system is OS X 10.8.4 Mountain Lion, and our guest operating systems were Windows 7 Enterprise x64 and Windows 8 Pro x64. They are more focused on small applications.Our tests were performed on a 2012 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display, equipped with a quad-core 2.7 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU, 16 GB of RAM, and a 256 GB SSD.Parallels Desktop, one of their products, is only for Mac. Testing MethodologyParallels is a virtualization software that supports all Windows versions since Windows 2000, and most operating systems in the world. For tests where a significant difference was apparent, Windows 8 results are included and noted.
Parallels Vs Full Uninstall OfFor all other tests, results were recorded in the same format as they were reported by their respective benchmark applications. The results for each sequence of tests were averaged to obtain the reported results.For time measurements, results were rounded to the nearest whole second. All tests were then repeated with Desktop 9.Each test was performed three times for each virtual machine on each version of Parallels Desktop, with the exception of the boot, shut down, suspend, and resume tests, which were performed five times. We then performed a full uninstall of Parallels Desktop 8, installed Parallels Desktop 9, and then imported the existing virtual machines into version 9. Due to the new tests, Geekbench 3 scores cannot be compared to scores from earlier versions of the benchmark.Geekbench results reveal a consistent pattern: native performance is the best, and Parallels Desktop 9 provides a modest improvement over Parallels 8. We have a separate chart for each, below. Readers should note that Geekbench was recently updated to Version 3, which now reports both single- and multi-core results. It does not measure any aspect of a platform’s graphical or storage capabilities. However, once again, the performance improvements are not significant. It’s based on Maxon’s venerable Cinema 4D modeling and animation software.Cinebench tests three primary areas: OpenGL GPU performance, measured in frames per second, and multi- and single-core rendering performance, measured in comparative “points.” For all categories, a higher score indicates better performance.Just as we saw with Geekbench, the Cinebench results give us a performance ranking of Native > Parallels 9 > Parallels 8. Cinebench 11.5Maxon’s Cinebench is another cross-platform benchmark that focuses on GPU performance and CPU rendering capabilities. 3DMark (2013)The new 3DMark benchmark, released earlier this year, contains three tests that are meant to cover the entire range of gaming hardware: Ice Storm, Cloud Gate, and Fire Strike. Due to the limitations of the MacBook’s mid-level NVIDIA GPU, we opted to run the “basic” preset, which is a DirectX 9 test at 1280x720 with high-end options like tessellation disabled.The test reports an overall average frame rate, minimum frame rate, and maximum frame rate, all measured as frames per second, with higher numbers indicating better performance.Parallels Desktop 9 again offers only slight performance gains with DirectX 9 graphics, practically equal to the score in Parallels 8 and trailing average native performance significantly.Perhaps the most important benefit offered in Parallels 9 is a higher minimum frame rate, almost equal to that of native performance. When cranked up, it can bring even the most expensive dedicated gaming GPUs to their knees. The new version beat Parallels 8 by only 2 seconds, and both took significantly longer than iTunes running via Boot Camp. We then timed the results.The results reveal that audio encoding capability alone is not a sufficient reason to upgrade to Parallels 9. The files, clocking in at 323 MB, were encoded to 192 kbps MP3 files using iTunes’ built-in encoder. While these factors are of less import to most users, those who manage multiple virtual machines can realize definite gains to their workflow efficiency by not having to wait minutes for each machine to boot or resume.Virtual machine management was already impressive in Parallels 8, so we wanted to see how things had improved, if at all, for Version 9. Virtual Machine ManagementWith practically every new version of virtualization software, be it Parallels Desktop or competitor VMware Fusion, the developer boasts improved startup, shutdown, suspend, and resume times. We deleted the copied file and rebooted the machine after each measurement to ensure that any file system cache operations would not contaminate the results.Once again, there’s no change in performance between Parallels 8 and 9, with both versions taking 21 seconds on average to perform the operation, compared to 13 for native Windows via Boot Camp. Windows vs mac for video game programmingLoading VMs from a mechanical hard drive, or packing them with auto-launching software will of course result in longer times. Our machines were loaded from an SSD and had minimal software configured to load at launch (Steam, Microsoft Security Essentials, and the OneNote agent from Office 2013). As always, your virtual machine times will vary based on your hardware and software configuration. The time to boot Windows 7 dropped 5 seconds from version 8 to 9, while Windows 8 boot times improved to a blistering 8 seconds.Aside from a few outliers of a second or two, the remaining functions took approximately the same time between Parallels 8 and Parallels 9. Also note that, unlike our other tests which averaged three results, these tests were measured five times each and rounded to the nearest second.Parallels 9 does indeed offer some nice performance improvements, most significantly in terms of cold boots. However, users should take a look at the new features, many of which add much value to the software beyond pure speed.Finally, these benchmarks looked exclusively at Windows. But, overall, the performance improvements are only minor compared to Parallels 8.Those using virtualization software to run certain low- or mid-range productivity apps will likely find no performance-based reason to upgrade to Parallels 9.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorNicole ArchivesCategories |